ONONDAGA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

79

20%

LEVEL 2

178

44%

LEVEL 3

114

28%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

64

18%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

103

49%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

82

41%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

143

44%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

9

25%

LEVEL 2

20

56%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

165

47%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

129

41%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

35

65%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

29

62%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

98

40%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

45

28%

LEVEL 2

80

50%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

64

42%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.