Skip to Content
Main content

LIVERPOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

142

44%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

120

42%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

74

46%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

67

45%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

44

27%

LEVEL 2

68

42%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

32

24%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

117

44%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

97

44%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

126

48%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

111

46%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

43

72%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

30

71%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

90

41%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

85

44%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

39

37%

LEVEL 2

52

49%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

35

38%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.