Skip to Content
Main content

THEODORE R DURGEE JUNIOR HIGH SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

129

25%

LEVEL 2

221

44%

LEVEL 3

126

25%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

151

62%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

8

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

68

64%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

121

44%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

83

61%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

110

24%

LEVEL 2

200

44%

LEVEL 3

113

25%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

134

62%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

87

19%

LEVEL 2

211

47%

LEVEL 3

121

27%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

109

55%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

42

74%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

42

91%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

79

20%

LEVEL 2

171

44%

LEVEL 3

114

29%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

88

54%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

50

44%

LEVEL 2

50

44%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

63

80%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.