LAFAYETTE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

155

40%

LEVEL 2

170

44%

LEVEL 3

47

12%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

69

37%

LEVEL 2

88

47%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

86

44%

LEVEL 2

82

42%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

46

35%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

70

63%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

127

50%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

96

32%

LEVEL 2

149

50%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

59

70%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

36

65%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

63

28%

LEVEL 2

115

52%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

92

56%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

48

46%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.