ONONDAGA HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

240

43%

LEVEL 3

162

29%

LEVEL 4

60

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

88

18%

LEVEL 2

224

46%

LEVEL 3

122

25%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

128

47%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

116

50%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

83

16%

LEVEL 2

218

43%

LEVEL 3

152

30%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

200

46%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

14

56%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

61

12%

LEVEL 2

218

44%

LEVEL 3

154

31%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

210

50%

LEVEL 3

119

28%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

34

51%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

43

70%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

76

15%

LEVEL 2

209

42%

LEVEL 3

152

31%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

199

47%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

19

31%

LEVEL 2

31

50%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

25

42%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.