Skip to Content
Main content

VERNON-VERONA-SHERRILL MIDDLE SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

145

47%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

124

53%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

89

55%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

22

22%

LEVEL 2

60

59%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

49

34%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

64

48%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

79

26%

LEVEL 2

144

48%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

121

54%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

143

50%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

119

56%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

22

92%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

96

46%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

74

52%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

49

49%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

50

54%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.