Skip to Content
Main content

BARKER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

88

23%

LEVEL 2

169

43%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

153

44%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

94

49%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

82

48%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

71

40%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

144

41%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

132

43%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

14

64%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

62

18%

LEVEL 2

161

45%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

136

45%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

26

74%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

25

58%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

60

35%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

86

47%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

91

51%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

132
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

164

43%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

129
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

152

44%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.