NIAGARA STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

151

46%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

136

43%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

74

44%

LEVEL 2

74

44%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

72

44%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

77

48%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

18

51%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

48

39%

LEVEL 2

56

45%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

45

36%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

68

49%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

71

54%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

12

55%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

109

40%

LEVEL 2

123

45%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

107

40%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

42

76%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

33

60%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

16

57%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

146

49%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

122

45%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.