Skip to Content
Main content

NEWFANE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

181

33%

LEVEL 2

243

45%

LEVEL 3

91

17%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

133

30%

LEVEL 2

210

47%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

107

44%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

65

33%

LEVEL 2

89

45%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

105

35%

LEVEL 2

136

45%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

121

49%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

167

32%

LEVEL 2

231

45%

LEVEL 3

88

17%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

115

28%

LEVEL 2

202

49%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

127

27%

LEVEL 2

229

48%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

191

51%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

54

79%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

47

68%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

165

46%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

128

49%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

82

44%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

69

37%

LEVEL 2

82

44%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.