Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #31 - STATEN ISLAND GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,963
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,575

LEVEL 1

7,895

30%

LEVEL 2

9,717

37%

LEVEL 3

5,945

22%

LEVEL 4

3,018

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,219
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,030

LEVEL 1

7,119

27%

LEVEL 2

8,692

33%

LEVEL 3

6,365

24%

LEVEL 4

3,854

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,265
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,767

LEVEL 1

3,681

29%

LEVEL 2

4,821

38%

LEVEL 3

2,856

22%

LEVEL 4

1,409

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,021
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,615

LEVEL 1

3,275

26%

LEVEL 2

4,319

34%

LEVEL 3

3,148

25%

LEVEL 4

1,873

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,698
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,808

LEVEL 1

4,214

31%

LEVEL 2

4,896

35%

LEVEL 3

3,089

22%

LEVEL 4

1,609

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,198
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,415

LEVEL 1

3,844

29%

LEVEL 2

4,373

33%

LEVEL 3

3,217

24%

LEVEL 4

1,981

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

39
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

29

27%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

67
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

36

31%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

39
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

30

28%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,327
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,144

LEVEL 1

243

11%

LEVEL 2

574

27%

LEVEL 3

709

33%

LEVEL 4

618

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,397
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,025

LEVEL 1

195

10%

LEVEL 2

433

21%

LEVEL 3

695

34%

LEVEL 4

702

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5,894
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,065

LEVEL 1

2,686

19%

LEVEL 2

5,485

39%

LEVEL 3

3,888

28%

LEVEL 4

2,006

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,589
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,606

LEVEL 1

2,340

17%

LEVEL 2

4,677

34%

LEVEL 3

4,024

30%

LEVEL 4

2,565

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

447
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,563

LEVEL 1

2,021

57%

LEVEL 2

1,095

31%

LEVEL 3

355

10%

LEVEL 4

92

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

551
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,364

LEVEL 1

1,755

52%

LEVEL 2

1,058

31%

LEVEL 3

419

12%

LEVEL 4

132

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,220
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,577

LEVEL 1

2,880

44%

LEVEL 2

2,477

38%

LEVEL 3

943

14%

LEVEL 4

277

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,576
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,773

LEVEL 1

2,755

41%

LEVEL 2

2,442

36%

LEVEL 3

1,158

17%

LEVEL 4

418

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,361
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,613

LEVEL 1

4,186

20%

LEVEL 2

8,066

39%

LEVEL 3

5,477

27%

LEVEL 4

2,884

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,376
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,167

LEVEL 1

3,099

16%

LEVEL 2

6,692

35%

LEVEL 3

5,729

30%

LEVEL 4

3,647

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

602
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,962

LEVEL 1

3,709

62%

LEVEL 2

1,651

28%

LEVEL 3

468

8%

LEVEL 4

134

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

843
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,863

LEVEL 1

4,020

59%

LEVEL 2

2,000

29%

LEVEL 3

636

9%

LEVEL 4

207

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,845
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,201

LEVEL 1

6,994

28%

LEVEL 2

9,362

37%

LEVEL 3

5,846

23%

LEVEL 4

2,999

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,078
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,662

LEVEL 1

6,249

25%

LEVEL 2

8,335

34%

LEVEL 3

6,252

25%

LEVEL 4

3,826

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

118
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,374

LEVEL 1

901

66%

LEVEL 2

355

26%

LEVEL 3

99

7%

LEVEL 4

19

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

141
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,368

LEVEL 1

870

64%

LEVEL 2

357

26%

LEVEL 3

113

8%

LEVEL 4

28

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,059
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,457

LEVEL 1

1,646

16%

LEVEL 2

3,752

36%

LEVEL 3

3,129

30%

LEVEL 4

1,930

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,693
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,270

LEVEL 1

1,316

13%

LEVEL 2

3,261

32%

LEVEL 3

3,273

32%

LEVEL 4

2,420

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,904
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,118

LEVEL 1

6,249

39%

LEVEL 2

5,965

37%

LEVEL 3

2,816

17%

LEVEL 4

1,088

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,526
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,760

LEVEL 1

5,803

37%

LEVEL 2

5,431

34%

LEVEL 3

3,092

20%

LEVEL 4

1,434

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.