Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENS GATEWAY-HEALTH SCIENCES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

103

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

59

21%

LEVEL 3

109

38%

LEVEL 4

102

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

72

43%

LEVEL 4

45

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

62

38%

LEVEL 4

59

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

58

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

47

39%

LEVEL 4

43

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

109
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

67

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

103
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

61

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

77
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

53

42%

LEVEL 4

24

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

48

40%

LEVEL 4

28

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

15

48%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

14

58%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

114

40%

LEVEL 4

102

36%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

36

43%

LEVEL 4

27

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

28

43%

LEVEL 4

22

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

76

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

81

37%

LEVEL 4

80

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.