Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #28 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,092
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,071

LEVEL 1

4,964

33%

LEVEL 2

5,015

33%

LEVEL 3

3,036

20%

LEVEL 4

2,056

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,753
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,451

LEVEL 1

4,215

29%

LEVEL 2

4,483

31%

LEVEL 3

3,056

21%

LEVEL 4

2,697

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,467
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,363

LEVEL 1

2,349

32%

LEVEL 2

2,547

35%

LEVEL 3

1,524

21%

LEVEL 4

943

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,840
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,004

LEVEL 1

1,935

28%

LEVEL 2

2,229

32%

LEVEL 3

1,541

22%

LEVEL 4

1,299

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,625
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,708

LEVEL 1

2,615

34%

LEVEL 2

2,468

32%

LEVEL 3

1,512

20%

LEVEL 4

1,113

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,913
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,447

LEVEL 1

2,280

31%

LEVEL 2

2,254

30%

LEVEL 3

1,515

20%

LEVEL 4

1,398

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

56
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

32

34%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

101
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

61

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

178
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

107

25%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

243
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

147

30%

LEVEL 3

130

27%

LEVEL 4

113

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,135
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,115

LEVEL 1

742

18%

LEVEL 2

1,238

30%

LEVEL 3

1,049

25%

LEVEL 4

1,086

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,288
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,884

LEVEL 1

611

16%

LEVEL 2

985

25%

LEVEL 3

1,028

26%

LEVEL 4

1,260

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,150
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,478

LEVEL 1

526

21%

LEVEL 2

802

32%

LEVEL 3

667

27%

LEVEL 4

483

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,245
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,335

LEVEL 1

404

17%

LEVEL 2

686

29%

LEVEL 3

624

27%

LEVEL 4

621

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

676
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,198

LEVEL 1

2,086

50%

LEVEL 2

1,436

34%

LEVEL 3

532

13%

LEVEL 4

144

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

789
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,926

LEVEL 1

1,805

46%

LEVEL 2

1,332

34%

LEVEL 3

535

14%

LEVEL 4

254

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

897
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,765

LEVEL 1

1,488

40%

LEVEL 2

1,380

37%

LEVEL 3

653

17%

LEVEL 4

244

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,087
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,670

LEVEL 1

1,282

35%

LEVEL 2

1,301

35%

LEVEL 3

699

19%

LEVEL 4

388

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,865
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,510

LEVEL 1

3,218

26%

LEVEL 2

4,427

35%

LEVEL 3

2,877

23%

LEVEL 4

1,988

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,431
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,721

LEVEL 1

2,543

22%

LEVEL 2

3,747

32%

LEVEL 3

2,828

24%

LEVEL 4

2,603

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

227
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,561

LEVEL 1

1,746

68%

LEVEL 2

588

23%

LEVEL 3

159

6%

LEVEL 4

68

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

322
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,730

LEVEL 1

1,672

61%

LEVEL 2

736

27%

LEVEL 3

228

8%

LEVEL 4

94

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4,913
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,387

LEVEL 1

3,931

29%

LEVEL 2

4,543

34%

LEVEL 3

2,903

22%

LEVEL 4

2,010

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,542
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,797

LEVEL 1

3,264

26%

LEVEL 2

3,991

31%

LEVEL 3

2,896

23%

LEVEL 4

2,646

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

179
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,684

LEVEL 1

1,033

61%

LEVEL 2

472

28%

LEVEL 3

133

8%

LEVEL 4

46

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

211
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,654

LEVEL 1

951

57%

LEVEL 2

492

30%

LEVEL 3

160

10%

LEVEL 4

51

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,844
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,221

LEVEL 1

554

17%

LEVEL 2

823

26%

LEVEL 3

862

27%

LEVEL 4

982

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,942
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,177

LEVEL 1

518

16%

LEVEL 2

717

23%

LEVEL 3

755

24%

LEVEL 4

1,187

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,248
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,850

LEVEL 1

4,410

37%

LEVEL 2

4,192

35%

LEVEL 3

2,174

18%

LEVEL 4

1,074

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,811
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,274

LEVEL 1

3,697

33%

LEVEL 2

3,766

33%

LEVEL 3

2,301

20%

LEVEL 4

1,510

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.