Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #27 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,615
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,678

LEVEL 1

7,236

33%

LEVEL 2

7,827

36%

LEVEL 3

4,285

20%

LEVEL 4

2,330

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,929
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,788

LEVEL 1

6,783

33%

LEVEL 2

7,076

34%

LEVEL 3

4,377

21%

LEVEL 4

2,552

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,329
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,564

LEVEL 1

3,353

32%

LEVEL 2

3,882

37%

LEVEL 3

2,155

20%

LEVEL 4

1,174

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,454
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,016

LEVEL 1

3,068

31%

LEVEL 2

3,494

35%

LEVEL 3

2,187

22%

LEVEL 4

1,267

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,286
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,114

LEVEL 1

3,883

35%

LEVEL 2

3,945

35%

LEVEL 3

2,130

19%

LEVEL 4

1,156

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,475
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,772

LEVEL 1

3,715

34%

LEVEL 2

3,582

33%

LEVEL 3

2,190

20%

LEVEL 4

1,285

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

19

34%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

61
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

131

41%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

235
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

221

31%

LEVEL 2

266

37%

LEVEL 3

145

20%

LEVEL 4

90

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,528
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,609

LEVEL 1

1,016

18%

LEVEL 2

2,065

37%

LEVEL 3

1,466

26%

LEVEL 4

1,062

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,378
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,867

LEVEL 1

922

19%

LEVEL 2

1,567

32%

LEVEL 3

1,334

27%

LEVEL 4

1,044

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,099
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,345

LEVEL 1

457

19%

LEVEL 2

789

34%

LEVEL 3

699

30%

LEVEL 4

400

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,131
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,275

LEVEL 1

430

19%

LEVEL 2

714

31%

LEVEL 3

650

29%

LEVEL 4

481

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

901
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,751

LEVEL 1

2,924

51%

LEVEL 2

1,926

33%

LEVEL 3

652

11%

LEVEL 4

249

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

969
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,381

LEVEL 1

2,616

49%

LEVEL 2

1,796

33%

LEVEL 3

698

13%

LEVEL 4

271

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,010
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,615

LEVEL 1

2,698

35%

LEVEL 2

2,907

38%

LEVEL 3

1,416

19%

LEVEL 4

594

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,197
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,487

LEVEL 1

2,575

34%

LEVEL 2

2,715

36%

LEVEL 3

1,541

21%

LEVEL 4

656

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,320
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,182

LEVEL 1

4,976

27%

LEVEL 2

6,886

38%

LEVEL 3

4,057

22%

LEVEL 4

2,263

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,444
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,737

LEVEL 1

4,319

26%

LEVEL 2

5,974

36%

LEVEL 3

4,026

24%

LEVEL 4

2,418

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

295
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,496

LEVEL 1

2,260

65%

LEVEL 2

941

27%

LEVEL 3

228

7%

LEVEL 4

67

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

485
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,051

LEVEL 1

2,464

61%

LEVEL 2

1,102

27%

LEVEL 3

351

9%

LEVEL 4

134

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,443
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,880

LEVEL 1

6,131

31%

LEVEL 2

7,306

37%

LEVEL 3

4,141

21%

LEVEL 4

2,302

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,751
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,058

LEVEL 1

5,709

30%

LEVEL 2

6,598

35%

LEVEL 3

4,238

22%

LEVEL 4

2,513

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

172
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,798

LEVEL 1

1,105

61%

LEVEL 2

521

29%

LEVEL 3

144

8%

LEVEL 4

28

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

178
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,730

LEVEL 1

1,074

62%

LEVEL 2

478

28%

LEVEL 3

139

8%

LEVEL 4

39

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,381
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,030

LEVEL 1

667

22%

LEVEL 2

982

32%

LEVEL 3

821

27%

LEVEL 4

560

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,443
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,866

LEVEL 1

592

21%

LEVEL 2

831

29%

LEVEL 3

798

28%

LEVEL 4

645

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,234
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,648

LEVEL 1

6,569

35%

LEVEL 2

6,845

37%

LEVEL 3

3,464

19%

LEVEL 4

1,770

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,486
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,922

LEVEL 1

6,191

35%

LEVEL 2

6,245

35%

LEVEL 3

3,579

20%

LEVEL 4

1,907

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.