Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 383 PHILIPPA SCHUYLER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 809

LEVEL 1

131

16%

LEVEL 2

426

53%

LEVEL 3

199

25%

LEVEL 4

53

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 746

LEVEL 1

135

18%

LEVEL 2

378

51%

LEVEL 3

170

23%

LEVEL 4

63

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

240

53%

LEVEL 3

119

26%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

221

53%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

65

18%

LEVEL 2

186

52%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

157

48%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

21

38%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

16

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

138
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

84

18%

LEVEL 2

251

53%

LEVEL 3

110

23%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

104
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

76

19%

LEVEL 2

213

54%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

147

57%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

140

49%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

106

14%

LEVEL 2

419

54%

LEVEL 3

199

26%

LEVEL 4

53

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

109

15%

LEVEL 2

368

52%

LEVEL 3

168

24%

LEVEL 4

63

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

26

68%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

99

55%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

79

53%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

108

17%

LEVEL 2

327

52%

LEVEL 3

150

24%

LEVEL 4

45

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

115

19%

LEVEL 2

299

50%

LEVEL 3

133

22%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.