Skip to Content
Main content

PS 289 GEORGE V BROWER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

107

42%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

84

37%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

56

44%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

34

31%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

49

39%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

50

42%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

73

35%

LEVEL 2

90

43%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

74

39%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

13

35%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

97

47%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

33

69%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

79

37%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.