Skip to Content
Main content

EMILY WARREN ROEBLING SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

75

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

129

33%

LEVEL 4

108

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

53

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

57

36%

LEVEL 4

44

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

55

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

60

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

85

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

28

31%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

13

35%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

100

37%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

100

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

17

28%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

174
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

75

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

234
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

126

33%

LEVEL 4

108

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

74

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

76

24%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

105

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

21

36%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

27

35%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.