Skip to Content
Main content

ANN MACARTHUR PRIMARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

90

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

95

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

48

35%

LEVEL 4

44

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

47

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

46

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

48

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

10

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

12

86%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

77

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

77

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

84

37%

LEVEL 4

88

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

93

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

19

50%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

14

47%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

174
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

90

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

156
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

93

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

81

35%

LEVEL 4

89

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

91

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

16

35%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.