Skip to Content
Main content

FRANCIS X HEGARTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

45

35%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

48

38%

LEVEL 4

37

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

22

39%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

21

34%

LEVEL 4

15

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

27

43%

LEVEL 4

22

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

26

34%

LEVEL 4

19

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

24

33%

LEVEL 4

27

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

20

47%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

46

40%

LEVEL 4

37

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

85
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

48

41%

LEVEL 4

37

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

28

36%

LEVEL 4

17

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

24

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

17

34%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.