Skip to Content
Main content

FONDA-FULTONVILLE 5-8 SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

131

31%

LEVEL 2

203

48%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

196

45%

LEVEL 3

109

25%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

63

31%

LEVEL 2

104

51%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

106

49%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

99

45%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

53

24%

LEVEL 2

90

41%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

128

31%

LEVEL 2

193

47%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

98

24%

LEVEL 2

186

45%

LEVEL 3

107

26%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

185

51%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

171

45%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

40

67%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

32

54%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

55

23%

LEVEL 2

120

50%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

76

41%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

61

32%

LEVEL 2

93

49%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.