KENDALL CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

87

28%

LEVEL 2

148

48%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

121

42%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

56

34%

LEVEL 2

73

45%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

69

45%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

75

52%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

52

40%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

131

49%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

104

43%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

15

63%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

134

50%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

111

45%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

23

61%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

85

49%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

63

47%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

36

26%

LEVEL 2

63

46%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.