ATTICA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 665

LEVEL 1

167

25%

LEVEL 2

294

44%

LEVEL 3

151

23%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

144

25%

LEVEL 2

240

41%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

77

24%

LEVEL 2

135

43%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

90

26%

LEVEL 2

159

46%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

134

42%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

164

25%

LEVEL 2

284

44%

LEVEL 3

149

23%

LEVEL 4

49

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

135

24%

LEVEL 2

235

42%

LEVEL 3

148

27%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

104

18%

LEVEL 2

267

47%

LEVEL 3

148

26%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

216

43%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

63

66%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

51

63%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

78

19%

LEVEL 2

183

44%

LEVEL 3

116

28%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

89

36%

LEVEL 2

111

44%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

81

37%

LEVEL 2

90

41%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.