Skip to Content
Main content

ATTICA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

136

30%

LEVEL 2

213

46%

LEVEL 3

93

20%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

107

28%

LEVEL 2

179

46%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

96

43%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

80

45%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

72

30%

LEVEL 2

117

49%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

64

30%

LEVEL 2

99

47%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

134

30%

LEVEL 2

205

46%

LEVEL 3

91

20%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

104

28%

LEVEL 2

176

47%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

82

21%

LEVEL 2

194

50%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

160

49%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

54

72%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

38

63%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

65

22%

LEVEL 2

136

47%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

121

49%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

71

42%

LEVEL 2

77

45%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

58

41%

LEVEL 2

58

41%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.