WAYLAND-COHOCTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

174

27%

LEVEL 2

266

41%

LEVEL 3

154

24%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

132

22%

LEVEL 2

229

39%

LEVEL 3

166

28%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

87

28%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

120

42%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

87

26%

LEVEL 2

147

44%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

172

27%

LEVEL 2

259

41%

LEVEL 3

149

24%

LEVEL 4

49

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

128

22%

LEVEL 2

224

39%

LEVEL 3

161

28%

LEVEL 4

65

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

127

22%

LEVEL 2

254

43%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

94

17%

LEVEL 2

214

40%

LEVEL 3

164

30%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

47

77%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

38

68%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

130

40%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

86

37%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

121

37%

LEVEL 2

136

42%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

150

41%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.