Skip to Content
Main content

LIVONIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

195

49%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

74

24%

LEVEL 2

145

46%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

107

51%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

79

46%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

88

46%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

66

47%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

188

49%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

141

47%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

184

51%

LEVEL 3

113

31%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

140

49%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

27

71%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

26

84%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

142

49%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

100

48%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

37

33%

LEVEL 2

53

47%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

39

37%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.