Skip to Content
Main content

BEAVER RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

140

37%

LEVEL 3

136

36%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

76

40%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

132

37%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

123

38%

LEVEL 3

127

40%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

32

65%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

27

50%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

81

38%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.