Skip to Content
Main content

MOUNT MARKHAM CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

232

43%

LEVEL 2

210

39%

LEVEL 3

78

15%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

197

43%

LEVEL 2

195

42%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

106

40%

LEVEL 2

115

44%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

89

39%

LEVEL 2

102

45%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

126

46%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

108

46%

LEVEL 2

93

39%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

224

43%

LEVEL 2

208

40%

LEVEL 3

76

15%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

192

42%

LEVEL 2

191

42%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

160

37%

LEVEL 2

189

43%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

181

50%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

72

73%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

83

85%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

75

32%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

68

32%

LEVEL 2

98

46%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

157

52%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

129

51%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.