Skip to Content
Main content

HERKIMER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

194

37%

LEVEL 2

218

42%

LEVEL 3

95

18%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

174

34%

LEVEL 2

194

38%

LEVEL 3

103

20%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

103

39%

LEVEL 2

114

43%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

89

34%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

91

36%

LEVEL 2

104

41%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

85

34%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

179

37%

LEVEL 2

200

41%

LEVEL 3

88

18%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

158

34%

LEVEL 2

173

37%

LEVEL 3

95

20%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

139

31%

LEVEL 2

206

45%

LEVEL 3

94

21%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

55

81%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

100

44%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

97

42%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

133

45%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.