Skip to Content
Main content

HERKIMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

116

34%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

58

33%

LEVEL 2

79

45%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

106

34%

LEVEL 2

125

40%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

88

27%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

80

27%

LEVEL 2

134

45%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

36

84%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

65

42%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

84

41%

LEVEL 2

86

42%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.