Skip to Content
Main content

COXSACKIE-ATHENS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

198

31%

LEVEL 2

264

42%

LEVEL 3

120

19%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

153

30%

LEVEL 2

191

37%

LEVEL 3

127

25%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

92

30%

LEVEL 2

125

41%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

106

32%

LEVEL 2

139

42%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

78

30%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

169

30%

LEVEL 2

235

42%

LEVEL 3

112

20%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

131

29%

LEVEL 2

168

37%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

146

26%

LEVEL 2

257

45%

LEVEL 3

119

21%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

52

85%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

73

20%

LEVEL 2

155

43%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

125

45%

LEVEL 2

109

39%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

87

42%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.