Skip to Content
Main content

CAIRO-DURHAM CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

281

49%

LEVEL 2

206

36%

LEVEL 3

69

12%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

211

45%

LEVEL 2

172

37%

LEVEL 3

71

15%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

136

45%

LEVEL 2

121

40%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

105

42%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

145

53%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

31

11%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

106

48%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

224

47%

LEVEL 2

169

36%

LEVEL 3

64

13%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

171

44%

LEVEL 2

139

35%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

35

61%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

22

56%

LEVEL 2

17

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

209

42%

LEVEL 2

200

40%

LEVEL 3

68

14%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

157

39%

LEVEL 2

163

41%

LEVEL 3

69

17%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

72

90%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

54

81%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

90

35%

LEVEL 2

106

42%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

73

35%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

191

59%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

138

53%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.