MAYFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

104

26%

LEVEL 2

186

46%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

126

31%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

87

46%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

55

29%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

99

47%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

71

32%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

100

26%

LEVEL 2

181

47%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

121

30%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

165

50%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

142

42%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

48

67%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

55

73%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

109

48%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

77

44%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

72

38%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.