Skip to Content
Main content

LAKE PLACID CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

115

35%

LEVEL 2

128

40%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

110

37%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

56

33%

LEVEL 2

77

46%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

61

39%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

59

38%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

49

35%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

108

36%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

104

37%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

124

44%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

104

42%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

38

86%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

38

81%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

62

32%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

44

48%

LEVEL 2

36

39%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

48

46%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.