AKRON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

194

28%

LEVEL 2

263

38%

LEVEL 3

167

24%

LEVEL 4

60

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

131

20%

LEVEL 2

231

35%

LEVEL 3

185

28%

LEVEL 4

107

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

138

40%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

110

32%

LEVEL 2

125

37%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

79

25%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

46

52%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

28

34%

LEVEL 2

42

51%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

213
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

147

25%

LEVEL 2

227

39%

LEVEL 3

154

26%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

272
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

100

18%

LEVEL 2

184

33%

LEVEL 3

172

31%

LEVEL 4

100

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

143

23%

LEVEL 2

242

40%

LEVEL 3

165

27%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

216

37%

LEVEL 3

180

31%

LEVEL 4

106

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

51

68%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

54

72%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

104

22%

LEVEL 2

192

40%

LEVEL 3

129

27%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

63

14%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

85

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

90

44%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.