CHEEKTOWAGA-SLOAN UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

245

38%

LEVEL 2

289

45%

LEVEL 3

92

14%

LEVEL 4

16

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

195

36%

LEVEL 2

242

44%

LEVEL 3

78

14%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

112

36%

LEVEL 2

145

46%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

124

50%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

144

44%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

109

37%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

211

36%

LEVEL 2

273

47%

LEVEL 3

83

14%

LEVEL 4

14

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

161

33%

LEVEL 2

224

46%

LEVEL 3

72

15%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

23

72%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

152

29%

LEVEL 2

260

50%

LEVEL 3

92

18%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

124

28%

LEVEL 2

210

48%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

93

76%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

71

64%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

136

47%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

62

27%

LEVEL 2

103

45%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

156

44%

LEVEL 2

153

43%

LEVEL 3

39

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

133

42%

LEVEL 2

139

44%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.