Skip to Content
Main content

ALDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 757

LEVEL 1

166

22%

LEVEL 2

357

47%

LEVEL 3

173

23%

LEVEL 4

61

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

115

19%

LEVEL 2

247

41%

LEVEL 3

187

31%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

91

23%

LEVEL 2

181

47%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

75

20%

LEVEL 2

176

48%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

134

43%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 733

LEVEL 1

159

22%

LEVEL 2

346

47%

LEVEL 3

168

23%

LEVEL 4

60

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

243
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

111

19%

LEVEL 2

238

40%

LEVEL 3

185

31%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

113

17%

LEVEL 2

318

49%

LEVEL 3

165

25%

LEVEL 4

59

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

215

41%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

53

52%

LEVEL 2

39

38%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

40

47%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

102

19%

LEVEL 2

252

46%

LEVEL 3

138

25%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

73

17%

LEVEL 2

160

37%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

105

51%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

87

49%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.