Skip to Content
Main content

DELAWARE ACADEMY CSD AT DELHI GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

140

43%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

82

49%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

47

31%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

129

42%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

64

21%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

124

46%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

33

61%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

29

53%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

81

41%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

43

34%

LEVEL 2

59

47%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

30

31%

LEVEL 2

40

41%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.