HOMER INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

206

39%

LEVEL 2

210

39%

LEVEL 3

88

17%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

102

26%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

100

26%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

87

35%

LEVEL 2

110

44%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

119

42%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

197

38%

LEVEL 2

205

40%

LEVEL 3

85

17%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

147

32%

LEVEL 2

194

42%

LEVEL 3

88

19%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

59

79%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

24

73%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

73

25%

LEVEL 2

132

45%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

133

56%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

74

41%

LEVEL 2

66

37%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.