HOMER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

83

25%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

139

33%

LEVEL 2

174

41%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

100

47%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

83

40%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

79

24%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

92

28%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

131

33%

LEVEL 2

166

41%

LEVEL 3

89

22%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

121

43%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

87

25%

LEVEL 2

157

45%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

36

69%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

52

69%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

109

43%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

38

38%

LEVEL 2

43

43%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

81

48%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.