Skip to Content
Main content

MCGRAW CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

141

56%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

118

51%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

71

55%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

64

54%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

70

58%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

54

48%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

131

56%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

107

50%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

104

50%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

82

45%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

37

84%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

36

77%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

57

48%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

43

39%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

84

63%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

75

61%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.