Skip to Content
Main content

TACONIC HILLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

282

44%

LEVEL 2

240

38%

LEVEL 3

97

15%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

277

45%

LEVEL 2

187

31%

LEVEL 3

93

15%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

140

45%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

124

43%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

142

44%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

153

47%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

244

44%

LEVEL 2

207

37%

LEVEL 3

90

16%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

227

44%

LEVEL 2

158

31%

LEVEL 3

85

16%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

21

46%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

31

55%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

197

36%

LEVEL 2

230

42%

LEVEL 3

97

18%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

85

89%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

273

45%

LEVEL 2

186

31%

LEVEL 3

93

15%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

110

36%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

172

51%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

117
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

278

44%

LEVEL 2

239

38%

LEVEL 3

97

15%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

146
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

273

45%

LEVEL 2

185

31%

LEVEL 3

93

15%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.