Skip to Content
Main content

NORTHEASTERN CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

162

27%

LEVEL 2

275

46%

LEVEL 3

133

22%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

137

25%

LEVEL 2

223

41%

LEVEL 3

129

24%

LEVEL 4

54

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

140

50%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

119

44%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

95

30%

LEVEL 2

135

43%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

75

28%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

152

27%

LEVEL 2

253

45%

LEVEL 3

127

23%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

130

25%

LEVEL 2

210

41%

LEVEL 3

122

24%

LEVEL 4

54

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

9

69%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

9

82%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

96

20%

LEVEL 2

236

48%

LEVEL 3

129

26%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

198

45%

LEVEL 3

121

27%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

66

61%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

66

66%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

150

46%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

125

44%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

100

37%

LEVEL 2

125

46%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.