AUSABLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

172

34%

LEVEL 2

223

44%

LEVEL 3

82

16%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

95

30%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

76

34%

LEVEL 2

107

48%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

59

42%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

116

42%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

54

32%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

166

34%

LEVEL 2

214

44%

LEVEL 3

78

16%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

86

29%

LEVEL 2

115

39%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

105

25%

LEVEL 2

213

50%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

112

45%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

67

87%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

49

80%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

120

48%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

66

41%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

110

44%

LEVEL 2

103

41%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

59

39%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

106
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

168

34%

LEVEL 2

223

45%

LEVEL 3

81

16%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.