Skip to Content
Main content

CASSADAGA VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

180

40%

LEVEL 2

189

42%

LEVEL 3

60

13%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

144

39%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

86

38%

LEVEL 2

104

46%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

75

39%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

94

43%

LEVEL 2

85

38%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

169

40%

LEVEL 2

178

42%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

136

38%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

113

31%

LEVEL 2

179

49%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

99

32%

LEVEL 2

128

41%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

67

87%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

45

78%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

104

47%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

117

52%

LEVEL 2

85

38%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

97

47%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.