Skip to Content
Main content

GOWANDA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

195

50%

LEVEL 2

155

40%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

154

54%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

95

50%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

71

50%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

100

50%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

83

57%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

13

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

66

70%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

58

76%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

112

42%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

82

45%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

148

44%

LEVEL 2

151

45%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

111

46%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

47

92%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

43

93%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

65

42%

LEVEL 2

70

45%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

52

45%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

130

56%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

102

59%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.