Skip to Content
Main content

CATTARAUGUS-LITTLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

138

33%

LEVEL 2

189

45%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

153

42%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

65

32%

LEVEL 2

97

48%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

73

34%

LEVEL 2

92

43%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

82

44%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

132

33%

LEVEL 2

183

46%

LEVEL 3

69

17%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

100

28%

LEVEL 2

150

43%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

80

24%

LEVEL 2

169

51%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

54

19%

LEVEL 2

135

47%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

58

69%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

53

71%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

111

48%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

80

43%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

68

36%

LEVEL 2

81

43%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.