ALLEGANY-LIMESTONE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

84

32%

LEVEL 2

125

48%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

113

44%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

68

50%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

34

27%

LEVEL 2

56

45%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

41

32%

LEVEL 2

57

45%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

57

44%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

115

47%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

106

45%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

62

27%

LEVEL 2

119

51%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

106

47%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

22

73%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

86

47%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

76

45%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

37

47%

LEVEL 2

39

49%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

35

41%

LEVEL 2

37

44%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.