ALLEGANY-LIMESTONE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

171

30%

LEVEL 2

227

40%

LEVEL 3

120

21%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

125

24%

LEVEL 2

195

37%

LEVEL 3

125

24%

LEVEL 4

85

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

119

44%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

69

25%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

162

31%

LEVEL 2

210

40%

LEVEL 3

110

21%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

118

24%

LEVEL 2

185

37%

LEVEL 3

112

22%

LEVEL 4

83

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

120

24%

LEVEL 2

213

43%

LEVEL 3

117

24%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

177

38%

LEVEL 3

123

26%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

51

74%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

42

66%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

97

25%

LEVEL 2

158

40%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

74

45%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

62

35%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.