Skip to Content
Main content

DEPOSIT CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

123

47%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

54

22%

LEVEL 2

110

45%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

45

33%

LEVEL 2

65

47%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

49

39%

LEVEL 2

58

46%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

55

47%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

89

36%

LEVEL 2

114

47%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

105

46%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

118

53%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

95

48%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

36

88%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

41

46%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

70

40%

LEVEL 2

82

47%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

81

48%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.