Skip to Content
Main content

RICHARD T STANK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

80

21%

LEVEL 2

201

52%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

194

54%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

97

56%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

84

59%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

104

49%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

110

51%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

186

51%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

65

20%

LEVEL 2

175

54%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

55

16%

LEVEL 2

186

54%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

177

57%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

25

58%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

26

54%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

128

52%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

117

53%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

73

51%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

77

56%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.