Skip to Content
Main content

CUBA-RUSHFORD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

125

31%

LEVEL 2

195

49%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

93

26%

LEVEL 2

147

41%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

54

32%

LEVEL 2

89

52%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

66

43%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

106

46%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

181

49%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

87

26%

LEVEL 2

132

40%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

182

55%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

130

43%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

52

78%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

37

60%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

111

49%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

69

40%

LEVEL 2

84

48%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.